The Subaru Outback and Crosstrek are two popular SUV models from the Japanese automaker Subaru. While both vehicles share some similarities, such as Subaru’s signature all-wheel drive system and rugged styling, there are significant differences between them in terms of size, performance, and features. Understanding these distinctions can help potential buyers choose the model that best suits their needs and preferences.
The Outback is classified as a midsize SUV, while the Crosstrek falls into the compact SUV category. This size difference is one of the most noticeable contrasts between the two models, affecting various aspects of their design and functionality. The Outback offers more interior space and cargo capacity, making it better suited for families or those who frequently need to transport larger items. On the other hand, the Crosstrek’s smaller size provides better maneuverability in urban environments and potentially improved fuel efficiency.
Let’s take a closer look at some key differences between these two Subaru models:
| Feature | Subaru Outback | Subaru Crosstrek |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle Class | Midsize SUV | Compact SUV |
| Length | 191.1 inches | 176.4 inches |
| Cargo Space (seats up) | 32.6 cubic feet | 20.8 cubic feet |
| Base Engine | 2.5L 4-cylinder (182 hp) | 2.0L 4-cylinder (152 hp) |
| Towing Capacity | Up to 3,500 lbs | Up to 1,500 lbs |
Size and Dimensions
The most apparent difference between the Subaru Outback and Crosstrek lies in their physical dimensions. The Outback, being a midsize SUV, is significantly larger than the compact Crosstrek. This size difference affects various aspects of the vehicles, including interior space, cargo capacity, and overall presence on the road.
The Outback measures 191.1 inches in length, 73.0 inches in width, and 66.1 inches in height. In contrast, the Crosstrek is more compact, with dimensions of 176.4 inches in length, 70.9 inches in width, and 62.8 inches in height. This size difference translates to more interior space in the Outback, particularly in terms of passenger room and cargo capacity.
When it comes to cargo space, the Outback offers a generous 32.6 cubic feet behind the rear seats, which can be expanded to 75.6 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down. The Crosstrek, being smaller, provides 20.8 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats, expandable to 55.3 cubic feet with the seats folded. This substantial difference in cargo capacity makes the Outback a more suitable choice for those who frequently need to transport larger items or have more extensive storage needs.
Despite their size difference, both vehicles offer similar ground clearance of 8.7 inches, which contributes to their off-road capabilities. However, the Outback’s longer wheelbase of 108.1 inches compared to the Crosstrek’s 104.9 inches can provide a smoother ride on highways and uneven terrain.
Performance and Powertrain
The Subaru Outback and Crosstrek also differ significantly in terms of their performance capabilities and powertrain options. These differences affect factors such as acceleration, towing capacity, and fuel efficiency.
The Outback offers two engine options:
- A 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine producing 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque (standard on most trims)
- A more powerful 2.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine generating 260 horsepower and 277 lb-ft of torque (available on higher trims)
In contrast, the Crosstrek has a more limited engine lineup:
- A 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine producing 152 horsepower and 145 lb-ft of torque (standard on base models)
- A slightly more powerful 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine generating 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque (available on higher trims)
Both vehicles come standard with Subaru’s Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system, which provides excellent traction and stability in various driving conditions. However, the Outback’s more powerful engine options give it an edge in terms of acceleration and overall performance, especially when fully loaded or when towing.
Speaking of towing, the Outback has a significantly higher towing capacity. When properly equipped, it can tow up to 3,500 pounds, making it suitable for hauling small trailers or boats. The Crosstrek, on the other hand, has a more modest towing capacity of 1,500 pounds, which limits its utility for those who need to tow heavier loads.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the Crosstrek generally has a slight advantage due to its smaller size and lighter weight. The base Crosstrek with the 2.0-liter engine achieves an EPA-estimated 28 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. The Outback with the standard 2.5-liter engine manages 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, which is still impressive for a larger vehicle.
Features and Technology
While both the Subaru Outback and Crosstrek come well-equipped with modern features and technology, there are some differences in the available options and standard equipment between the two models.
The Outback, being a more premium offering, generally comes with a more extensive list of standard features. Both vehicles offer Subaru’s EyeSight Driver Assist Technology as standard, which includes features like adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and pre-collision braking. However, the Outback often includes more advanced versions of these systems.
One notable difference is in the infotainment system. The Outback features a large 11.6-inch vertical touchscreen on most trims, which provides a tablet-like interface for controlling various vehicle functions. The Crosstrek, in comparison, typically comes with a smaller 8-inch touchscreen, although it still offers similar functionality including Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility.
The Outback also offers some premium features that are not available on the Crosstrek, such as:
- Ventilated front seats
- Hands-free power liftgate
- DriverFocus Distraction Mitigation System
- 180-degree front-view camera
Both vehicles offer Subaru’s X-MODE system for enhanced off-road capability, but the Outback’s system is often more advanced, with dual-function modes for snow/dirt and deep snow/mud on some trims.
Price and Value
As expected, the larger and more feature-rich Outback comes with a higher price tag compared to the Crosstrek. The base model Outback typically starts several thousand dollars higher than the entry-level Crosstrek. This price difference reflects the Outback’s larger size, more powerful engine options, and additional features.
However, the value proposition of each vehicle depends on the buyer’s specific needs and preferences. The Crosstrek offers a more affordable entry point into Subaru’s SUV lineup, with many of the brand’s signature features like all-wheel drive and rugged styling. It’s an excellent choice for urban dwellers who want a compact vehicle with some off-road capability.
The Outback, while more expensive, offers significantly more space, higher towing capacity, and a broader range of features. It’s better suited for families, outdoor enthusiasts who need more cargo space, or those who frequently travel long distances and appreciate the extra comfort of a larger vehicle.
Both vehicles hold their value well, which is a hallmark of the Subaru brand. This factor can make either model a good long-term investment, depending on the buyer’s needs and budget.
FAQs About Subaru Outback And Crosstrek Differences
- Which is bigger, the Subaru Outback or Crosstrek?
The Subaru Outback is significantly larger, measuring 191.1 inches in length compared to the Crosstrek’s 176.4 inches. - Does the Outback have more cargo space than the Crosstrek?
Yes, the Outback offers 32.6 cubic feet behind the rear seats, while the Crosstrek provides 20.8 cubic feet. - Which model has better fuel efficiency?
The Crosstrek generally has slightly better fuel efficiency due to its smaller size and lighter weight. - Can the Outback tow more than the Crosstrek?
Yes, the Outback can tow up to 3,500 pounds when properly equipped, while the Crosstrek is limited to 1,500 pounds. - Are there significant price differences between the two models?
Yes, the Outback typically has a higher starting price, reflecting its larger size and more extensive feature set.