The Mazda CX-3 and CX-30 are two popular compact SUV models from the Japanese automaker Mazda. While they may seem similar at first glance, there are several key differences between these two vehicles in terms of size, performance, features, and positioning in Mazda’s lineup. The CX-3 is the smaller and older model, first introduced in 2015, while the CX-30 is a newer and slightly larger offering that debuted in 2019 as a 2020 model year vehicle. Understanding the distinctions between these two crossovers can help potential buyers determine which one better suits their needs and preferences.
Both the CX-3 and CX-30 showcase Mazda’s KODO design language and upscale interiors, but the CX-30 represents a more modern and refined take on the compact SUV formula. The CX-30 slots between the CX-3 and the larger CX-5 in Mazda’s lineup, offering a compromise in terms of size and practicality. While the CX-3 is based on the Mazda2 subcompact platform, the CX-30 shares its underpinnings with the current generation Mazda3, resulting in a more spacious and comfortable interior.
| Feature | Mazda CX-3 | Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 168.3 inches | 173.0 inches |
| Width | 69.6 inches | 70.7 inches |
| Height | 60.7 inches | 61.7 inches |
| Wheelbase | 101.2 inches | 104.5 inches |
| Base Engine | 2.0L 4-cylinder | 2.5L 4-cylinder |
| Horsepower | 148 hp | 186 hp |
Size and Exterior Dimensions
One of the most noticeable differences between the Mazda CX-3 and CX-30 is their size. The CX-30 is larger in every dimension, offering a more substantial presence on the road and increased interior space. The CX-30 measures 173.0 inches in length, 70.7 inches in width, and 61.7 inches in height, with a wheelbase of 104.5 inches. In comparison, the CX-3 is more compact, measuring 168.3 inches long, 69.6 inches wide, and 60.7 inches tall, with a shorter 101.2-inch wheelbase.
This size difference translates to a more spacious interior in the CX-30, particularly in terms of rear seat legroom and cargo capacity. The CX-30 offers 94.1 cubic feet of passenger volume, compared to the CX-3’s 87.6 cubic feet. Cargo space is also significantly larger in the CX-30, with 20.2 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 45.2 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down. The CX-3, on the other hand, provides 17.8 cubic feet of cargo space with the rear seats up and 42.7 cubic feet with them folded.
The exterior styling of both vehicles follows Mazda’s KODO design philosophy, but the CX-30 features a more refined and modern interpretation. It incorporates sleeker lines, a bolder grille design, and more pronounced wheel arches, giving it a more premium appearance. The CX-3, while still attractive, has a more traditional subcompact crossover look with its shorter hood and more upright stance.
Performance and Powertrain Options
When it comes to performance, the Mazda CX-30 offers more powerful engine options compared to the CX-3. The base engine in the CX-30 is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder producing 186 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque. This engine provides ample power for everyday driving and highway merging. Additionally, the CX-30 is available with a turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that generates up to 250 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque when using premium fuel.
In contrast, the Mazda CX-3 comes equipped with a smaller 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 148 horsepower and 146 lb-ft of torque. While this engine is adequate for the CX-3’s smaller size, it doesn’t offer the same level of performance as the CX-30’s powerplants. Both vehicles come standard with a six-speed automatic transmission and are available with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive configurations.
The CX-30’s larger size and more powerful engines result in a slightly lower fuel economy compared to the CX-3. The CX-30 with the base engine and front-wheel drive achieves an EPA-estimated 25 mpg city and 33 mpg highway, while the CX-3 manages 29 mpg city and 34 mpg highway in its front-wheel-drive configuration. However, the difference in real-world fuel economy may be less noticeable, especially considering the CX-30’s additional power and space.
Interior Quality and Features
Both the Mazda CX-3 and CX-30 offer well-designed interiors with high-quality materials, but the CX-30 takes things a step further with a more premium feel and additional features. The CX-30’s cabin is noticeably more spacious, providing better headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers. The materials used in the CX-30 are of a higher grade, with more soft-touch surfaces and available leather upholstery options.
The CX-30 also benefits from Mazda’s latest interior design language, featuring a clean, minimalist dashboard layout with a 8.8-inch infotainment display mounted high on the dash. This screen is controlled by a rotary knob on the center console, which some users may find more intuitive than a touchscreen while driving. The CX-3, while still well-appointed for its class, has a slightly older interior design with a 7-inch touchscreen display.
In terms of technology features, both models offer similar base equipment, including Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, Bluetooth connectivity, and a rearview camera. However, the CX-30 is available with more advanced options, such as a 12-speaker Bose premium audio system, a head-up display, and adaptive LED headlights. The CX-30 also offers more advanced driver assistance features, including available traffic jam assist and a 360-degree camera system.
Pricing and Value Proposition
The Mazda CX-3 and CX-30 occupy different price points, reflecting their positioning in Mazda’s lineup. The CX-3, being the smaller and older model, has a lower starting price of around $21,000 for the base trim. This makes it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers looking for a stylish and efficient subcompact crossover.
The CX-30, with its larger size and more premium features, starts at a higher price point of approximately $23,000 for the base model. While this represents a price increase over the CX-3, many buyers may find the additional space, power, and features to be worth the extra cost. The CX-30 also offers more trim levels and options, allowing buyers to customize their vehicle to a greater degree.
When considering value, it’s important to factor in the CX-30’s newer platform, updated technology, and potential for better resale value due to its more recent introduction to the market. The CX-30’s positioning as a more premium offering may also appeal to buyers looking for a vehicle that bridges the gap between mainstream and luxury compact SUVs.
FAQs About What Is The Difference Between Mazda Cx3 And Cx30?
- Which is bigger, the Mazda CX-3 or CX-30?
The Mazda CX-30 is larger in all dimensions, offering more interior space and cargo capacity than the CX-3. - Does the Mazda CX-30 have better performance than the CX-3?
Yes, the CX-30 offers more powerful engine options, including a turbocharged engine not available in the CX-3. - Are there significant differences in fuel economy between the CX-3 and CX-30?
The CX-3 has slightly better fuel economy due to its smaller size and engine, but the difference is minimal in real-world driving. - Which model offers more advanced technology features?
The CX-30 generally offers more advanced technology options, including a larger infotainment screen and more driver assistance features. - Is the Mazda CX-30 more expensive than the CX-3?
Yes, the CX-30 has a higher starting price than the CX-3, reflecting its larger size and more premium positioning in Mazda’s lineup.