The Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 are two popular compact SUVs that often confuse potential buyers due to their similar names and features. While both vehicles share the Mazda brand’s commitment to quality and performance, they have distinct characteristics that set them apart. The CX-5 has been a staple in Mazda’s lineup since 2012, known for its refined driving dynamics and upscale interior. In contrast, the CX-50 is a newer addition, introduced in 2022, designed with a more rugged and adventurous spirit.
Understanding the differences between these two models is crucial for making an informed decision when shopping for a new SUV. The CX-5 caters to those who prioritize a more urban-friendly, car-like driving experience, while the CX-50 appeals to drivers seeking a blend of on-road comfort and off-road capability. Both models offer Mazda’s signature driving enjoyment, but they diverge in terms of design philosophy, dimensions, and target audience.
Feature | Mazda CX-5 | Mazda CX-50 |
---|---|---|
Introduction Year | 2012 | 2022 |
Design Focus | Urban Refinement | Rugged Adventure |
Length | 180.1 inches | 185.8 inches |
Width | 72.6 inches | 75.6 inches |
Exterior Design and Dimensions
The most noticeable difference between the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 lies in their exterior design. The CX-5 showcases Mazda’s Kodo design language with its sleek, urban-oriented aesthetics. It features smooth lines, a refined grille, and an overall sophisticated appearance that appeals to those who appreciate a more classic SUV look. On the other hand, the CX-50 adopts a bolder, more rugged stance with its wider body, more pronounced wheel arches, and a more aggressive front fascia.
In terms of dimensions, the CX-50 is noticeably larger than its CX-5 counterpart. The CX-50 measures 185.8 inches in length, which is about 5.7 inches longer than the CX-5’s 180.1 inches. This extended length translates to more interior space, particularly in the cargo area. The CX-50 is also wider, with a width of 75.6 inches compared to the CX-5’s 72.6 inches, giving it a more planted appearance and potentially more shoulder room for passengers.
The height difference between the two models is minimal, with the CX-5 standing slightly taller at 66.1 inches compared to the CX-50’s 63.5 inches. However, this slight difference in height, combined with the CX-50’s wider stance, contributes to its more athletic and adventure-ready appearance. The CX-50 also boasts a longer wheelbase, which not only affects its proportions but also impacts its ride quality and interior space.
Ground Clearance and Off-Road Capability
One of the key differences that sets the CX-50 apart is its increased ground clearance. While the CX-5 offers a respectable 7.6 inches of ground clearance, the CX-50 raises the bar with 8.3 inches. This additional clearance gives the CX-50 an edge when it comes to light off-roading and navigating rough terrain. It’s an important factor for buyers who plan to take their SUV on adventures beyond paved roads.
Interior Space and Comfort
Despite their exterior size differences, the interior space of both the CX-5 and CX-50 is surprisingly similar in many aspects. However, there are some notable distinctions that potential buyers should consider. The CX-5 has long been praised for its upscale interior that punches above its weight class, offering a level of refinement typically found in more expensive vehicles.
The CX-50, while maintaining Mazda’s commitment to quality, introduces a more rugged aesthetic to its cabin design. This is evident in the use of materials and design elements that evoke a sense of adventure and durability. Both models offer comfortable seating for five passengers, but the CX-50’s additional width provides a bit more shoulder room, especially in the rear seats.
Cargo Capacity
When it comes to cargo space, the CX-50 has a slight advantage due to its larger overall dimensions:
Cargo Area | Mazda CX-5 | Mazda CX-50 |
---|---|---|
Behind 2nd Row | 30.9 cu. ft. | 31.4 cu. ft. |
With Rear Seats Folded | 59.6 cu. ft. | 56.3 cu. ft. |
While the difference in cargo capacity with the rear seats up is minimal, the CX-50 offers slightly more space for everyday use. However, it’s worth noting that with the rear seats folded, the CX-5 actually provides more total cargo volume. This difference in configuration flexibility could be a deciding factor for buyers who frequently need to transport larger items.
Performance and Powertrain Options
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 offer similar engine options, but there are some differences in their performance characteristics. The base engine for both models is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder producing 187 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque. This engine provides adequate power for daily driving and is known for its smooth operation.
For those seeking more power, both models offer a turbocharged version of the 2.5-liter engine. In the CX-5, this engine produces up to 250 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque when using premium fuel. The CX-50’s turbo engine is slightly more powerful, offering up to 256 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque with premium fuel. This slight increase in power, combined with the CX-50’s more adventure-oriented design, gives it a sportier feel on the road.
Transmission and Drivetrain
Both models come standard with a six-speed automatic transmission and Mazda’s i-Activ all-wheel-drive system. However, the CX-50 introduces Mazda’s new Mi-Drive system, which offers different drive modes including an off-road mode. This feature enhances the CX-50’s capability in various driving conditions, making it more versatile for outdoor adventures.
The CX-50 also boasts a higher towing capacity when properly equipped. While the CX-5 can tow up to 2,000 pounds, the CX-50 with the turbo engine can handle up to 3,500 pounds. This significant increase in towing capacity makes the CX-50 a more attractive option for those who need to tow small trailers or boats.
Fuel Economy
Despite their differences in size and capability, both the CX-5 and CX-50 offer competitive fuel economy figures:
Model | City MPG | Highway MPG |
---|---|---|
CX-5 (Base Engine) | 24 | 30 |
CX-50 (Base Engine) | 24 | 30 |
CX-5 (Turbo) | 22 | 27 |
CX-50 (Turbo) | 23 | 29 |
As shown, the fuel economy figures are remarkably similar between the two models, with the CX-50 slightly edging out the CX-5 in turbo configurations. This similarity is impressive considering the CX-50’s larger size and more powerful engine options.
Technology and Features
Both the CX-5 and CX-50 come well-equipped with modern technology and safety features. However, as the newer model, the CX-50 introduces some updated tech that gives it a slight edge in this department. Both models offer Mazda’s intuitive infotainment system, but the CX-50 features a larger 10.25-inch display as standard, compared to the CX-5’s 10.25-inch screen that’s optional on lower trims.
The CX-50 also introduces wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, which is a convenient upgrade from the wired-only option in the CX-5. Both models offer a comprehensive suite of safety features under Mazda’s i-Activsense banner, including adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and automatic emergency braking.
Unique Features
The CX-50 introduces some unique features that cater to its more adventure-oriented positioning. These include:
- Panoramic sunroof: Available on the CX-50, offering a more open feel to the cabin
- Off-road drive mode: Part of the Mi-Drive system, enhancing capability on unpaved surfaces
- Terracotta interior option: A distinctive color scheme that adds to the rugged aesthetic
While these features are not essential for every buyer, they contribute to the CX-50’s distinct character and may appeal to those looking for a more lifestyle-oriented vehicle.
Pricing and Value Proposition
When it comes to pricing, the CX-5 generally starts at a slightly lower price point than the CX-50. However, the exact pricing can vary depending on trim levels and options. The CX-5’s lower starting price makes it an attractive option for buyers looking for a refined compact SUV without breaking the bank. The CX-50, with its newer design and additional features, commands a slight premium but offers more in terms of capability and modern amenities.
Both models represent good value in their segment, offering a level of quality and driving dynamics that often exceed their price points. The choice between the two often comes down to personal preferences and specific needs rather than a clear-cut value proposition.
FAQs About Mazda CX-5 vs CX-50
- Which is bigger, the CX-5 or CX-50?
The CX-50 is larger, measuring 185.8 inches in length compared to the CX-5’s 180.1 inches. - Does the CX-50 have better off-road capability than the CX-5?
Yes, the CX-50 has higher ground clearance and an off-road drive mode, making it more capable off-pavement. - Are the engines the same in both models?
Both offer similar 2.5L engines, but the CX-50’s turbo option produces slightly more power. - Which model has better fuel economy?
Fuel economy is similar, with the CX-50 slightly more efficient in turbo configurations. - Is the CX-50 replacing the CX-5 in Mazda’s lineup?
No, Mazda plans to sell both models concurrently to cater to different customer preferences.